State v. Prawitt’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Low · State v. Dean · State v. Baker · Mineral County v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERV. · 537 So. 2d 603 - Fieselman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) an error exists; (ii) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (iii) the error is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for [Defendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“failure to ensure that his objections were recorded at trial and his failure to reconstruct the record under rule 11 precludes any finding of a due process violation under the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“the issue must be sufficiently raised to a level of consciousness before the trial court and must be supported by evidence or relevant legal authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.