Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 262 - State v. Marks

2011 UT App 262 - State v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · California v. Trombetta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a trial court's decision to limit cross-examination, we [must first] review the legal rule applied for correctness and the application of the rule to the facts of the case for an abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Utah, like most other jurisdictions, recognizes the relevance of the complainant's past sexual conduct to rebut the sexual innocence inference in appropriate cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “a child's ability to fabricate allegations of sexual abuse against a defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.