2011 UT App 291 - State v. Charles’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Lovasco · 103 S. Ct. 247 - Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. v. United States · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · Benson v. Empire State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel raised for the first time on appeal presents a question of law”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“To demonstrate prejudice, a defendant must show that 'but for counsel's deficient performance there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[blefore we will reverse a conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel, we must be persuaded that there was no conceivable tactical basis for counsel's actions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.