2011 UT App 307 - Poll v. Poll’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Workman · Kimball v. Kimball · 2008 UT App 11 - Stonehocker v. Stonehocker · Bradford v. Bradford · 2002 UT App 219 - State v. Comer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a bench trial or other proceeding in which the judge serves as fact finder, the court has considerable discretion to assign relative weight to the evidence before it,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“includes the right to minimize or even disregard certain evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although the parties' evidence and testimony may be susceptible to more than one interpretation the trial court, as the fact finder, is to consider and weigh all of the conflicting evidence and find the facts, and determine the credibility of the witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.