2011 UT App 331 - Taylor v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · State ex rel. K.F. v. State · West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co. · Von Hake v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'As a general rule, in order to prove contempt for failure to comply with a court order it must be shown that the person cited for contempt knew what was required, had the ability to comply, and intentionally failed or refused to do so.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Summer v. Summer“See Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-801(5) (2008).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Summer v. Summer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.