2011 UT App 351 - In Re Jf’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on D.F. v. M.F.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. Grandparents seek to pursue their claim that the no contact provisions were inappropriately modified or removed by the district court because Grandparents' consent was not obtained, that claim must be presented to the district court where the modification occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. M.F. v. J.F.“was dismissed by stipulation of the parties and court order ... and the matter was transferred to the Fourth District Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. M.F. v. J.F.“lack[ed] jurisdiction to hear the Order to Show Cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. M.F. v. J.F.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.