Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 352 - Bowen v. Bowen

2011 UT App 352 - Bowen v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. McDonald · Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co. · Tangren Family Trust v. Tangren Ex Rel. Tangren · 42 Ill. App. 3d 330 - Praznik v. Sport Aero, Inc. · Gillett v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Alpplication of the discovery rule also involves a subsidiary factual determination-the point at which a person reasonably should know that he or she has suffered a legal injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Reformation is an equitable remedy and because of the advantaged position of the trial court, we give considerable deference to [the trial court's] findings and judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We review this subsidiary factual determination under a clearly erroneous standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.