Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 358 - Ward v. Graydon

2011 UT App 358 - Ward v. Graydon’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Orvis v. Johnson · Rio Algom Corp. v. Jimco Ltd. · Scott v. Majors · Olwell v. Clark · Sweeney Land Co. v. Kimball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[wlhere the party opposed to the motion submits no documents in opposition, the moving party may be granted summary judgment only ... if he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the moving party would bear the burden of proof at trial, the movant must establish each element of his claim in order to show that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.