2011 UT App 39 - State v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gardner v. BD. OF CTY. COM. OF WASATCH CTY. · Anderson v. Taylor · Smith v. Iversen · State v. VAANA · 2001 UT App 75 - State v. Spry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TJrial courts have broad discretion in matters of discovery.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if a review of the record persuades the [appellate] court that without the error there was a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable result for the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In light of this overwhelming evidence of Defendant's guilt, we conclude that any error in denying Defendant's motion to compel was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prawitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.