2011 UT App 396 - State v. BHAG SINGH’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “When reviewing a bench trial for sufficiency of [the] ewdence, we must sustain the trial court's judgment unless it is against the clear weight of the evidence, or ... the appellate court otherwise reaches a definite and firm conviction © that a mistake has been made.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Finlayson · State v. Whitaker

2. “had an interpreter while he consulted with his attorney about waiving his right to a jury trial and his attorney requested the bench trial in [the defendant's] presence”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Finlayson · 2019 UT App 95 - State v. Sagal

3. “intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Whitaker · D.M. v. State