2011 UT App 70 - Olsen v. LABOR COM'N’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. K.F. v. State · King v. Industrial Com'n of Utah · Nebeker v. Utah State Tax Commission · Adams v. Board of Review of Indus. Com'n · Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tlhe fact that an employee returned to work for some period of time following his industrial injury does not automatically preclude him from claiming permanent total disability benefits at a later date if he continues to suffer substantial pain throughout the period of his continued employment or if his industrial injury worsens to the point that he is no longer able to maintain regular employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'When an agency has discretion to apply its factual findings to the law, we will not disturb the agency's application unless its determination exceeds the bounds of reasonableness and rationality.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a claimant is not required to continue working merely because someone is willing to hire him if he must exert superhuman efforts ... in order to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.