Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UTAPP 75 - State v. Hauptman

State v. Hauptman’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Youngblood · McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · State v. Templin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in which jurors untruthfully answered a question regarding their prior experiences or current situation, which] answers ... could be determined to be true or false at the time they were given”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(als much as [she] believed during jury selection that [the defendant viewing] pornography would not play a part in [her] vote, [she] regret[ted] to say that it did to some extent,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'Some courts have interpreted [the first prong of the] McDonough [test] to require a finding of juror misconduct only if a prospective juror is aware her answers are false”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.