2011 UT App 9 - State v. Prows’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Crane v. Kentucky · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Clopten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an interrogation has typically been viewed as coercive only when it is much longer than in the instant case”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. P.G. v. State · P.G. v. State“pointing out such considerations-possibilities over which the police clearly exercise no control-[does not amount] to a threat or promise of the kind pertinent to our inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.