Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 VT 68 - In Re Shenandoah LLC

In Re Shenandoah LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc. · In re Spencer · Lussier v. Truax

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provided no information to the court, and no actual documentation to support their conclusory statements that they had no 'control' over the Trust's activities and derived no 'benefit' from the Trust's land development activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is well-established that ultimate or conclusory facts and conclusions of law ... cannot be utilized on a summary-judgment motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.