Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 WY 151 - Hagerman v. State

Hagerman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Swain v. State · YellowBear v. State · Jackson v. State · Jennings v. State · Weedman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question of whether a sentence is illegal because it does not include proper credit for time served is a question of law that we review de movo. Swain v. State, 2009 WY 142, ¶8 , 220 P.3d 504, 506 (Wyo.2009).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n cases where concurrent sentences have been imposed in a single case, the defendant is entitled to have credit for time served applied equally against both sentences, but this principle does not apply where a defendant is serving concurrent sentences imposed in separate cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.