Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 WY 2 - Boucher v. State

Boucher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Doggett v. United States · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. MacDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence or overcrowded courts should be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such cireumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant. Finally, a valid reason, such as a missing witness, should serve to justify appropriate delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “issues that- are unaccompanied by cogent argument or citation. to pertinent legal authority”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is true that the appellant was incarcerated from the time he was arrested until trial, which certainly weighs in favor of the appellant. We also have no doubt that the appellant experienced pretrial anxiety, as most defendants experience in that situation. However, we cannot say that the appellant experienced an atypical level of anxiety; nor can we say that the appellant was incarcerated for such a lengthy period of time prior to trial that a finding of substantial prejudice is automatically warranted. See Campbell [v. State ], 999 P.2d [649,] 656 [(Wyo.2000)] (Anxiety is typically present with pretrial incarceration, so to prevail an appellant "must demonstrate that she suffered prejudice in an extraordinary or unusual manner.").”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.