People v. Dominguez’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 224 Ill. 2d 312 - People v. Perry · 181 Ill. 2d 395 - In Re Estate of Rennick · 221 Ill. 2d 338 - In Re JT · 214 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Jones · 171 Ill. 2d 469 - People v. Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'right to return to the courtroom within 30 days to file motions to vacate [his] plea of guilty and/or reconsider [his] sentence' "; notice that the " 'motions must be in writing and contain all the reasons to support them' " and that " '[a]ny reasons not contained therein will not be preserved for purposes of appeal' "; a warning that " '[s]hould [the defendant's] motion to vacate [his] plea of guilty be granted, [his] plea of guilty and the judgment *** entered thereon [would] be vacated, meaning erased' " and that the " 'case [would] be set back down on the trial calendar for further proceedings' "; and an admonishment that if the defendant wished to file a notice of appeal after denial of his motions and could not afford an attorney, he would be provided " 'an attorney free of charge, along with the transcripts necessary for those purposes.' " Id. ¶ 5. In addition, the defendant in Dominguez was provided a "written form signed by defendant acknowledging he understood the Rule 605 admonishments, which did track the actual language of the rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Braden“'right to return to the courtroom within 30 days to file motions to vacate [his] plea of guilty and/or reconsider [his] sentence'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Braden“'an attorney free of charge, along with the transcripts necessary for those purposes.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Braden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.