Pielet v. Pielet’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 233 Ill. 2d 345 - In Re Alfred HH · 95 Ill. 2d 211 - Kozak v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF FIREMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND · 14 Ill. 2d 284 - Allen v. Meyer · 187 Ill. 2d 341 - Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder · 224 Ill. 2d 274 - Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“invite the court to decide the issues based on the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Summary judgment is a drastic measure and should only be granted if the movant's right to judgment is clear and free from doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.