Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 IL App (1st) 103210 - Ruby v. Ruby

2012 IL App (1st) 103210 - Ruby v. Ruby’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 187 Ill. 2d 341 - Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder · 145 Ill. 2d 166 - Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Donovan · United States v. Printy · Brady v. Paine · 235 Ill. 2d 565 - Citizens National Bank v. Kids Hope United, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the language of the document is clear and unambiguous, a court should not modify or create new terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “they concede there are no genuine issues of material fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.