In re Christopher P.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 224 Ill. 2d 312 - People v. Perry · 221 Ill. 2d 338 - In Re JT · 217 Ill. 2d 348 - People v. Christopher K. · 139 Ill. 2d 399 - Barth v. Reagan · 229 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Beachem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'legitimate questions' " existed regarding whether the Treatment Program was " 'unauthorized detention beyond the 30 days allowed by the Juvenile Act.' " The State responded that the Treatment Program was properly classified as custodial, but "in the absence of any alternative placement and given [respondent's] need,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“An appeal is considered moot where it presents no actual controversy or where the is- sues involved in the trial court no longer exist because intervening events have rendered it im- possible for the reviewing court to grant effectual relief to the complaining party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This court will address a moot question only if one of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine applies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.