Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2012 ND 87

Johnson v. WSI

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2012

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2012-05-03

Relies on State v. Delaney · State v. Tibor

Decided 2012-05-03

¶1Filed 5/3/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72012 ND 84

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Art Tibor, Petitioner and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20110313

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable William W. McLees, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Thomas Myron Jackson, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant.

¶30

¶31Nathan Kirke Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802, for respondent and appellee.

¶32Tibor v. State

¶33No. 20110313

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Art Tibor appealed from a district court order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.  In 2006, Tibor was convicted of gross sexual imposition, and this Court affirmed in State v. Tibor, 2007 ND 146, 738 N.W.2d 492.  Tibor subsequently filed a motion for new trial, which the district court denied.  This Court summarily affirmed in State v. Tibor, 2010 ND 71, 789 N.W.2d 731.  On appeal, Tibor argues that the district court erred when it proceeded with a hearing on the State’s motion to dismiss his post-conviction relief application without Tibor having an opportunity to be present and participate in the hearing and without having given notice.

¶37[¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6).

¶38[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶39Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶40Mary Muehlen Maring

¶41Daniel J. Crothers

¶42Dale V. Sandstrom

/2012/nd/87 · .json · Public domain