Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 OHIO 2224 - State v. Eafford

State v. Eafford’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

64 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Long · State v. Barnes · State v. Payne · State v. Pelfrey · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a court to notice plain error, the error must be an obvious defect in a trial's proceedings, it must have affected substantial rights, and it must have affected the outcome of the trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Notice of plain error * * * is to be taken with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The judgment entry stated the jury found the defendant guilty of R.C. 2913.51(A) and stated the offense was a felony of the fifth degree, but the verdict form did not state the degree of the offense or include a finding of value. We concluded that because the indictment clearly alleged the value of the property was within the fifth-degree felony range, the verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.