Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 Ohio 2407 - State v. Morris

State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

394
cited by 394 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

393 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1181 (§ 701 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on State v. Burnside · State v. Sage · AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp. · State v. Broom · State v. Diar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 394 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A review under the abuse-of-discretion standard is a deferential review.”
    36 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'Abuse of discretion' has been described as including a ruling that lacks a 'sound reasoning process.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.