2012 OHIO 4327 - State v. McAlmont

[Cite as State v. McAlmont,

133 Ohio St.3d 162

2012-Ohio-4327

.]




           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCALMONT, APPELLEE.
       [Cite as State v. McAlmont,

133 Ohio St.3d 162

2012-Ohio-4327

.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell.
(No. 2011-0065—Submitted September 12, 2012—Decided September 27, 2012.)
                APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County,
                           No. 09-CA-21,

2010-Ohio-5879

.
                                 __________________
          {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of State v. Gunnell,

132 Ohio St.3d 442

2012-Ohio-3236

973 N.E.2d 243

.
          O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ.,
concur.
          LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., dissent for the reasons
stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell,

132 Ohio St.3d 442

, 2012-
Ohio-3236,

973 N.E.2d 243

.
                                 __________________
          D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew
Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
          Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee.
                              ______________________