State v. Rucker

[Cite as State v. Rucker, 

, 

.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RUCKER, APPELLANT.
         [Cite as State v. Rucker, 

, 

.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority
        of State v. Moore.
    (Nos. 2012-1097 and 2012-1218—Submitted December 5, 2012—Decided
                                   December 6, 2012.)
    APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County,
                              No. 26212, 

.
                                    _______________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and
reversed in part on the authority of State v. Moore, 

, 2012-
Ohio-5479, 

.           The cause is remanded to the trial court for
resentencing regarding the mandatory fine.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard
S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.
        Dewitt Rucker, pro se.
                            __________________________