State v. Raber’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

62 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “D.R. relies primarily on State v. Raber in which the Ohio Supreme Court held that the trial court lacked authority to re-open sentencing to classify the defendant a sex offender more than one year after it imposed its original sentence. 134 Ohio St.3d 350 , 2012–Ohio–5636, 982 N.E.2d 684, ¶ 4 . The Supreme Court further stated, 'Because sex-offender registration is now punitive in nature, double-jeopardy protections barred the court from subsequently classifying Raber as a Tier I sex offender at a new proceeding held more than a year after its original sentence.' Id. {¶71}”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re D.S.

2. “Directly pertinent to the issue here, we held that Raber-who had served the imposed sentence of incarceration-had a legitimate expectation of finality in his sentence and the trial court was precluded from imposing additional punishment upon him”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Christian

3. “[a] presumption of regularity attaches to all judicial proceedings.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel