Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 Ohio 5695 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

541
cited by 541 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

539 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Huddleston v. United States · State v. Garner · State v. Jamison · State v. Broom · Pang v. Minch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 541 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider whether the other acts evidence is relevant to making any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    33 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith.”
    30 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence that an accused committed a crime other than the one for which he is on trial is not admissible when its sole purpose is to show the accused's propensity or inclination to commit crime or that he acted in conformity with bad character.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.