Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 OK 18 - Parris v. LIMES

Parris v. LIMES’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canterbury v. Spence · 154 Cal. App. 2d 560 - Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees · Woods v. Brumlop · Manley v. Brown · Hadnot v. Shaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all theories of liability fairly encompassed within the evidentiary material presented.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “all facts and inferences presented in the summary judgment record must be viewed in a light most favorable to the non-movant. Also, appellate courts must bear equally an affirmative duty to test all evidentiary material tendered in the summary process for its legal sufficiency to support the relief sought by the movant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this duty, a physician is obligated not only to disclose what he intends to do, but to supply information which addresses the question of whether he should do it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.