Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 OKCIVAPP 44 - Barnett v. Simmons

Barnett v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Ehrenhaus v. Reynolds · Abel v. Tisdale · State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City · Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When making that decision, the trial court's discretion, while broad, is not unbridled, and the sanction must be both fair and related to the particular claim or defense at issue in the discovery order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To reverse for abuse of discretion we must determine the trial judge made a clearly erroneous conclusion and judgment, against reason and evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'In order to determine whether there was an abuse of discretion, a review of the facts and the law is essential.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.