2012 Pa. Super. 126 - Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Hughes · Commonwealth v. Keaton · Commonwealth v. Newman · 2005 Pa. Super. 220 - In the Interest of F.P. · 2002 Pa. Super. 32 - Commonwealth v. Fink
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity[,] or absence of mistake or accident so long as the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.