Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 Pa. Super. 164 - Commonwealth v. Brandon

2012 Pa. Super. 164 - Commonwealth v. Brandon’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Whorton v. Bockting · Commonwealth v. Gamboa-Taylor · Commonwealth v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, a PCRA petition must be filed within one year from the date a judgment becomes final. There are three exceptions to this time requirement: (1) interference by government officials in the presentation of the claim; (2) newly discovered facts; and (3) an after-recognized constitutional right. When a petitioner alleges and proves that one of these exceptions is met, the petition will be considered timely. A PCRA petition invoking one of these exceptions must be filed within 60 days of the date the claims could have been presented. The timeliness requirements of the PCRA are jurisdictional in nature and, accordingly, a PCRA court cannot hear untimely petitions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.