2012 Pa. Super. 3 - Summers v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kripp v. Kripp · Bowser v. Blom · 2000 Pa. Super. 373 - Hong v. Pelagatti · 2008 Pa. Super. 29 - Krebs v. Krebs · 2008 Pa. Super. 282 - Plunkard v. McConnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 1910.19. Support. Modification. Termination. Guidelines as Substantial Change in Circumstances. Overpayments (a) A petition for modification or termination of an existing support order shall specifically aver the material and substantial change in circumstances upon which the petition is based. A new guideline amount resulting from new or revised support guidelines may constitute a material and substantial change in circumstances. The existence of additional income, income sources or assets identified through automated methods or otherwise may also constitute a material and substantial change in circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When evaluating a support order, this Court may only reverse the trial court’s determination where the order cannot be sustained on any valid ground. We will not interfere with the broad discretion afforded the trial court absent an abuse of the discretion or insufficient evidence to sustain the support order. An abuse of discretion is not merely an error of judgment; if, in reaching a conclusion, the court overrides or misapplies the law, or the judgment exercised is shown by the record to be either manifestly unreasonable or the product of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill will, discretion has been abused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. W.A.M. v. S.P.C.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.