2012 Pa. Super. 66 - Commonwealth v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Williams · Commonwealth v. Lark · Commonwealth v. Bennett · Commonwealth v. Carson · Commonwealth v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we need not decide whether the ... investigation of Jardines’ home violated his expectation of privacy”) (emphasis in original). Here, however, Ei-chler restricted his Fourth Amendment challenge to expectation-of-privacy principles, so we find it inappropriate to analyze Eichler’s argument under property-based principles. “It would be improper for this Court to act as counsel for a party ... [W]e must not write a party’s brief and develop the analysis necessary to support the party's position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.