Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 S.D. 1 - Robinson v. Mitchell

Robinson v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weitzel v. Sioux Valley Heart Partners · Gul v. Center for Family Medicine · Murray v. MANSHEIM · Gail M. Benson Living Trust v. Physicians Office Building, Inc. · Danielson v. Hess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a grant or a denial of summary judgment under SDCL 15-6-56(c), we determine whether the moving party has demonstrated the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and showed entitlement to judgment on the merits as a matter of law. The evidence must be viewed most favorably to the nonmoving party and reasonable doubts should be resolved against the moving party. The nonmoving party, however, must present specific facts showing that a genuine, material issue for trial exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “would affect the outcome of the suit ... in that 'a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.