People Ex Rel. P.S.E.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (§ 102 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)
Relies on Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians · 63 Cal. App. 4th 700 - In Re Michael G. · 142 Cal. App. 4th 988 - In Re Adoption of Hannah S. · Stephens v. State · In re A.N.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any party seeking to effect a foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights to, an Indian child under State law shall satisfy the court that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and that these efforts have proven unsuccessful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Id. (quoting AA. v. State, 982 P.2d 256, 261 (Alaska 1999)); see P.S8.E., 816 N.W.2d at 115 (giving the parent a treatment plan and waiting for him to complete it would constitute passive efforts). Thus, in a termination proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People ex rel. A.R.“statutes are to be construed liberally in favor of the Indians, with ambiguous provisions interpreted to their benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People ex rel. A.R.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.