Marko v. Marko’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. · Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co. · Fuerstenberg v. Fuerstenberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Canon 3E(1) provides that 'a judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances' of (a) 'personal bias or prejudice' or 'personal knowledge,' (b) prior service as a lawyer in the matter, (c) economic interest, and (d) close personal relationship of relatives or parties to a proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[E]ven in cases where judges have had prior judicial exposure to parties, without more, ... this is insufficient to show that impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the facts and circumstances fit within the disqualifying criteria,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.