Heumiller v. Heumiller’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arneson v. Arneson · Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc. · Radigan v. Radigan · In Re West River Elec. Ass'n, Inc. · Barnes v. Matzner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is illogical ... to interpret the statute such that an accrued obligation that is fully paid when due is a “past due payment” under SDCL 25-7-7.3. Not one of us would agree with the Court’s interpretation of “past due payments” in any other context. Imagine if another creditor, such as a bank or utility company, claimed that even though you had fully paid your monthly mortgage payment or utility bill when it was due, the “payment” was “past due.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wiseman v. Wiseman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.