Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 SD 68 - Heumiller v. Heumiller

Heumiller v. Heumiller’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arneson v. Arneson · Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc. · Radigan v. Radigan · In Re West River Elec. Ass'n, Inc. · Barnes v. Matzner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is illogical ... to interpret the statute such that an accrued obligation that is fully paid when due is a “past due payment” under SDCL 25-7-7.3. Not one of us would agree with the Court’s interpretation of “past due payments” in any other context. Imagine if another creditor, such as a bank or utility company, claimed that even though you had fully paid your monthly mortgage payment or utility bill when it was due, the “payment” was “past due.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.