Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1922 (§ 112 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)
Relies on 70 Or. App. 10 - State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Charles · 130 Cal. App. 4th 1148 - In Re SB · 130 Cal. App. 4th 1148 - San Bernardino County Department of Children's Services v. Jeannie V. · D.E.D. v. State · Willoughby v. Grim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court shall consider the evidence of the need for continued temporary custody of the child in keeping with the best interests of the child.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“conducted under rules prescribed by the court,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“at least five different states have considered and rejected that ICWA fully applies at the stage of a temporary or emergency custody proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.