Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 SD 7 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Santobello v. New York · Puckett v. United States · State v. Nelson · State v. Bonner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) error, (2) that is plain, (3) affecting substantial rights; and only then may we exercise our discretion to notice the error if (4) it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Jones has not shown that the State’s error affected the outcome of the proceedings where, as in this case, the trial court, after finding that there had been a material breach of the plea agreement used its discretion to grant Jones’s motion to reconsider. At resentencing, the State fulfilled the terms of the plea agreement by explicitly setting forth the terms of the plea agreement[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.