Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 161 - State v. Dick

State v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · State v. Knight · State v. Pinder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite being informed of defendant's statements prior to trial and having reasonable knowledge that such statements might be used by the prosecution, defense counsel did not move for a continuance, to which he would have been entitled. Thus, under the facts of this case, we conclude that defendant waived relief under rule 16(g) ... by not making timely efforts to mitigate or eliminate the prejudice caused by the prosecutor's conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the prosecution introduces unexpected testimony, a defendant 'essentially waive[s] his right to later claim error' if the defendant fails to request a continuance or seek other appropriate relief under Rule 16(g).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Wle conclude that Defendant waived his right to challenge that evidence when he did not request a continuance or seek other relief under rule l6(g)....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.