Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 171 - State v. Bedell

State v. Bedell’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Litherland · State v. Kelley · IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an appellant must show that (1) [aln error exists; (i) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (if) the error is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Failure to raise futile objections does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”). 26 . See State v. Arguelles, 921 P.2d 439, 441 (Utah 1996) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.