Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 18 - Schwenke v. State

Schwenke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Frampton · Gardner v. State · Hutchings v. State · 2006 UT App 327 - State v. Wareham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no statutory or constitutional right to counsel in a post-conviction proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.