Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UT App 180 - State v. High

2012 UT App 180 - State v. High’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jernigan · State v. Holgate · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · State v. Menzies · United States v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any absence of mistake or lack of accident,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Put simply, if a scrupulous examination would have resulted in the evidence being admitted, the trial court's failure to conduct that examination has not harmed the defendant. In the alternative, we may assume that a scrupulous examination would have resulted in the exclusion of the evidence but that there is no reasonable likelihood that the assumed error affected the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[e]vidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is not admissible to prove a person's character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted in conformity with the character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.