Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 183 - State v. Mohamed

State v. Mohamed’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Pedersen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant must demonstrate first that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of the crime charged and second that the insufficiency was so obvious and fundamental that the trial court erred in submitting the case to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “specifically raised such that the issue was sufficiently raised to a level of consciousness before the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.