Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 187 - State v. Noor

State v. Noor’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · State v. Brown · 2007 UT App 255 - State v. Hirschi · State v. Santonio · KeyBANK v. SYSTEMS WEST

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will reverse the jury's verdict only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which he was convicted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a defendant challenges a jury verdict for insufficiency of the evidence, we review the evidence and all inferences which may be reasonably drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the issue must be specifically raised such that the issue was sufficiently raised to a level of consciousness before the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.