2012 UT App 203 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “may be overcome only if there is a lack of any conceivable tactical basis for counsel's actions.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gallegos · State v. Wright

2. “This is a stringent test, necessarily requiring some type of extrinsic indication that the evidence within the records exists and will, in fact, be exculpatory. The difficulty in meeting this test is deliberate and prudent in light of the sensitivity of these types of records and the worsening of under-reporting problems in the absence of a strong privilege.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2013 UT App 219 - McCloud v. State

3. “might include references to records of only certain counseling sessions, which are alleged to be relevant, independent allegations made by others that a victim has recanted, or extrinsic evidence of some disorder that might lead to uncertainty regarding a victim's trustworthiness.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2013 UT App 219 - McCloud v. State