Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 220 - Jelashovic v. State

Jelashovic v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Padilla v. Kentucky · Tillman v. State · State v. Maestas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel must inform her client whether his plea carries a risk of deportation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'The severity of deportation-the equivalent of banishment or exile-only underscores how critical it is for counsel to inform her noncitizen client that he faces a risk of deportation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Padilla requires only that the risks be expressed-not that they be expressed in any particular detail or by an attorney with any particular expertise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.