Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 244 - State v. Udy

State v. Udy’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Washington · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · United States v. Fogel · United States v. Husein · State v. Nelson-Waggoner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court refused to hear any statement in mitigation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Before imposing sentence, the court shall afford the defendant an opportunity to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of punishment, or to show any legal cause why sentence should not be imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the [district] court expressly indicates that the sentence announced is subject to change, it is not reasonable to expect that the sentence is final.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.