Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2012 UTAPP 245 - State v. Strieff

State v. Strieff’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Brown v. Illinois · Nix v. Williams · Rawlings v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A crucial element of inevitable discovery is independence; there must be some independent basis for discovery, and the investigation that inevitably would have led to the evidence [must] be independent of the constitutional violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the evidence would not necessarily have been discovered, then it must be excluded to effect the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule: to deter unconstitutional police conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(dissipating the taint of the unlawful detention, and that Officer Fackrell's detention of Strieff was not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.