State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Buckner v. Kennard · State v. Candedo · Grimmett v. State · Medel v. State · State v. Lovell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is timely and whether the trial court has jurisdiction to rule on that motion, we give no deference to the trial court's rulings but review them for correctness, as questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a sue cessful motion under rule 22(e) may have the effect of undoing the sentence, but it will not vest the defendant with new opportunities to challenge his case in ways unrelated to sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we will reject a claim purportedly brought via rule 22(e) that is, 'in reality, a second appeal from [the original] conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.